<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for www.TomSchaefer.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress</link>
	<description>A Tech Blog for Geeks by Tom Schaefer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 21:06:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Create WHS Restore Disk by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1326&#038;cpage=1#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 21:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1326#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>What about drivers? You can&#039;t restore without at least the network drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about drivers? You can&#8217;t restore without at least the network drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boxee and 7MCE by tom</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1526&#038;cpage=1#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1526#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>I run the Boxee and Hulu Apps with 7MCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run the Boxee and Hulu Apps with 7MCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boxee and 7MCE by jay</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1526&#038;cpage=1#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1526#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>Cool Stuff man. I tried out boxee for a little while and really liked the apps but missed some of the functionality of Windows 7 MCE. I am definitely going to try this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool Stuff man. I tried out boxee for a little while and really liked the apps but missed some of the functionality of Windows 7 MCE. I am definitely going to try this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lexmark, You suck! by jim</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=8&#038;cpage=1#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mot.is-a-geek.com/web/wordpress/?p=8#comment-808</guid>
		<description>All printer resellers be for warned.

I became a Lexmark reseller and once I had sold around 80 Lexmark&#039;s to a client a large distributor sold them printer at below my cost. I had switched the customer from HP to Lexmark. It appears Lexmark&#039;s intentions are to get the business any way it can. By providing large discounts to large distributors small reseller cannot compete.  The only thing we can do is provide them new business by the large distributors underselling us once our customers have purchased Lexmark. They can then finger point and say hey it wasn&#039;r Lexmark we can&#039;t stop our distributirs from selling printers for what they want to.

There printer perks program was time consuming and painful. They have recently made changes to eliminate cash and pay you with bonus points.

My suggestion is unless they make some positive changes to guide your customers away from their products. Lexmark is in a win win situation even if you lose a customer they still have the business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All printer resellers be for warned.</p>
<p>I became a Lexmark reseller and once I had sold around 80 Lexmark&#8217;s to a client a large distributor sold them printer at below my cost. I had switched the customer from HP to Lexmark. It appears Lexmark&#8217;s intentions are to get the business any way it can. By providing large discounts to large distributors small reseller cannot compete.  The only thing we can do is provide them new business by the large distributors underselling us once our customers have purchased Lexmark. They can then finger point and say hey it wasn&#8217;r Lexmark we can&#8217;t stop our distributirs from selling printers for what they want to.</p>
<p>There printer perks program was time consuming and painful. They have recently made changes to eliminate cash and pay you with bonus points.</p>
<p>My suggestion is unless they make some positive changes to guide your customers away from their products. Lexmark is in a win win situation even if you lose a customer they still have the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Troubleshoot Connection Issues with WHS by Install and Configure the WHS Toolkit &#171; MS Windows Home Server</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1199&#038;cpage=1#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Install and Configure the WHS Toolkit &#171; MS Windows Home Server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=1199#comment-636</guid>
		<description>[...] You can find the details here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can find the details here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dual WAN with pfsense by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538&#038;cpage=1#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Tom, thanks for the useful guide.

In response to the person asking how to setup dual wan in pfsense 2.0(beta) here is what to do.

1. Go to System\routing.  On the gateways tab add a gateway for each of your interfaces, eg: WAN and OPT1

2. Under System\routing.  On the groups tab create a group and assign each gateway the priority of &quot;Tier 1&quot;, the trigger can be &quot;member down&quot;

3.  Go to Firewall\rules.  On the LAN tab, edit the default rule.  Press the button for &quot;Gateway&quot; under advanced features and change it to the name of the gateway group you created in step 2.

You should be up and running. 

This was confusing to find since dual wan was moved from Services\Loadbalancer to the System&#124;Routing tab.  Monitor IP&#039;s are now configured on the gateway tab.

Pfsense 2.0 isn&#039;t ready for prime time but it has some nice features I couldn&#039;t resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, thanks for the useful guide.</p>
<p>In response to the person asking how to setup dual wan in pfsense 2.0(beta) here is what to do.</p>
<p>1. Go to System\routing.  On the gateways tab add a gateway for each of your interfaces, eg: WAN and OPT1</p>
<p>2. Under System\routing.  On the groups tab create a group and assign each gateway the priority of &#8220;Tier 1&#8243;, the trigger can be &#8220;member down&#8221;</p>
<p>3.  Go to Firewall\rules.  On the LAN tab, edit the default rule.  Press the button for &#8220;Gateway&#8221; under advanced features and change it to the name of the gateway group you created in step 2.</p>
<p>You should be up and running. </p>
<p>This was confusing to find since dual wan was moved from Services\Loadbalancer to the System|Routing tab.  Monitor IP&#8217;s are now configured on the gateway tab.</p>
<p>Pfsense 2.0 isn&#8217;t ready for prime time but it has some nice features I couldn&#8217;t resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dual WAN with pfsense by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538&#038;cpage=1#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538#comment-627</guid>
		<description>Not the ISP but the server, such as the messenger server. Yeah, you can wait for the next version but I don&#039;t know when that will be. You could always run the beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the ISP but the server, such as the messenger server. Yeah, you can wait for the next version but I don&#8217;t know when that will be. You could always run the beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dual WAN with pfsense by Nirudha Perera</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538&#038;cpage=1#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirudha Perera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538#comment-626</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom, do you mean it depends on the ISP? In my case I have a squid proxy between the pfsense box and the user PC&#039;s so I don&#039;t think sticky will be a solution for me, though it should fix it for others. Waiting for the next PFsense version and hoping it will have a squid package which can send traffic via multiple links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom, do you mean it depends on the ISP? In my case I have a squid proxy between the pfsense box and the user PC&#8217;s so I don&#8217;t think sticky will be a solution for me, though it should fix it for others. Waiting for the next PFsense version and hoping it will have a squid package which can send traffic via multiple links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dual WAN with pfsense by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538&#038;cpage=1#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538#comment-624</guid>
		<description>That could happen depending on how a company handles traffic. Use sticky connections to fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That could happen depending on how a company handles traffic. Use sticky connections to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dual WAN with pfsense by Nirudha Perera</title>
		<link>http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538&#038;cpage=1#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirudha Perera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomschaefer.org/web/wordpress/?p=538#comment-623</guid>
		<description>Hi, we tried a setup like this to load balance over 4 ADSL links. However we found more and more websites and MS Live Messenger seem to have issues with requests coming from multiple source IP addresses. Have you experienced this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, we tried a setup like this to load balance over 4 ADSL links. However we found more and more websites and MS Live Messenger seem to have issues with requests coming from multiple source IP addresses. Have you experienced this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
